Top h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets
Top h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets
Blog Article
Because there doesn't look like any "Formal" Load Data on the market for this Load, can some of you deliver a starting point with this mix and factors to consider when Functioning this Load up?
H4831 will perform from the Swift but not true effectively. You can expect to under no circumstances get the pressures you require for regularity With all the .223. 760, or H414 might be much better but for some motive I ain't the most important lover of most ball powders.
It truly is probably that no additional dialogue is required, in which circumstance we advocate commencing a brand new thread. If however you're feeling your reaction is needed you could still achieve this.
With the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me good groups and good velocity, but Rottweil R905 incorporates a significantly larger velocity and delivers marginally much better accuracy. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos inside the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave great precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally better. As a result, in Every single of such scenarios I went with another powder, but I will surely despise to divest myself of the H4831.
The one variance as I comprehend it is that the SC was designed to work through powder steps superior (which it does). The extended grains will not feed properly at all in certain actions. Thats my 02 :grin:
I have applied H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem with no difference. The only thing is the shorter cut provides you with somewhat more Room. Great luck!gun)
If there is no load data it is actually mainly because this powder is h4831sc not really suited to this cartridge. Ordinarily a person will not likely uncover one powder to fit all cartridges, plus the household of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you'll be inquiring about does not function.
If you have some heavier .224" bullets, you may perhaps discover a load that works Alright Along with the 4831. The bullets I tried that were around 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which had the conventional fourteen" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the greatest bullet that could stabilize, however it did that superbly. It's a funny-seeking bullet that has a rounded nose profile, however it shoots fantastic and kills effectively. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down at once with rib-cage hits.
The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take full advantage of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon extreme powder.
Ballistically, this Serious Extruded powder is the exact h4831 vs h4831sc copy of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain measurement, therefore, the designation SC or shorter Slice. The shorter, more compact kernels enable the powder to circulation through the powder steps more smoothly, assisting to relieve the regular cutting of granules.
Kansas Town, MO I would seize whichever is available at this time. I’ve utilized both however with my visit load and didn’t see something different overall performance wise.
It truly is possible that no further discussion is required, during which situation we advocate starting off a new thread. If nevertheless you're feeling your response is required you are able to nonetheless achieve this.
rayporter reported: i never observed a variation besides the common is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan. Click on to develop...
Needless to say, sitting all around for twenty+ yrs (I'm sure a man who remains utilizing the H4831 he acquired in the 60s), means that burn rates will probably change a smidge, and new h4831sc manufacture stuff is going to be slightly different as well.